[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1381910836-718-4-git-send-email-makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:07:15 +0900
From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>,
Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net 3/4] bridge: Fix the way the PVID is referenced
We are using the VLAN_TAG_PRESENT bit to detect whether the PVID is
set or not at br_get_pvid(), while we don't care about the bit in
adding/deleting the PVID, which makes it impossible to forward any
incomming untagged frame with vlan_filtering enabled.
Since vid 0 cannot be used for the PVID, we can use vid 0 to indicate
that the PVID is not set, which is slightly more efficient than using
the VLAN_TAG_PRESENT.
Fix the problem by getting rid of using the VLAN_TAG_PRESENT.
Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
---
net/bridge/br_private.h | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
index efb57d9..7ca2ae4 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
+++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
@@ -643,9 +643,7 @@ static inline u16 br_get_pvid(const struct net_port_vlans *v)
* vid wasn't set
*/
smp_rmb();
- return (v->pvid & VLAN_TAG_PRESENT) ?
- (v->pvid & ~VLAN_TAG_PRESENT) :
- VLAN_N_VID;
+ return v->pvid ?: VLAN_N_VID;
}
#else
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists