netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 7/9] qlcnic: Validate Tx queue only for 82xx adapters.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131017.150752.1363063739180510255.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:07:52 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	himanshu.madhani@...gic.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Dept_NX_Linux_NIC_Driver@...gic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 7/9] qlcnic: Validate Tx queue only for
 82xx adapters.

From: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@...gic.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:57:52 -0400

> From: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@...gic.com>
> 
> o validate Tx queue only in case of adapters which supports
>   multi Tx queue.
> 
>   This patch is to fix regression introduced in commit
>   aa4a1f7df7cbb98797c9f4edfde3c726e2b3841f
>   "qlcnic: Enable Tx queue changes using ethtool for 82xx Series adapter"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@...gic.com>

Do not submit bug fixes for "net-next" if they are for problems
that exist in 'net'.

What do several driver maintainers do this repeatedly?

Are you scared I'll reject the submission?  If it's really a bug fix
I won't, 'net' is where it really belongs.

I'm not applying this series, submit it properly.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html