netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] fib_trie: Send RTM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131017.161955.793695802575716229.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:19:55 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	kristian.evensen@...il.com
Cc:	ja@....bg, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] fib_trie: Send RTM_DELROUTE when link goes
 down

From: Kristian Evensen <kristian.evensen@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 22:11:39 +0200

> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg> wrote:
>>         IIRC, such notifications were not implemented
>> to avoid storms to routing daemons. Not sure if this is
>> still true.
> 
> Thanks for letting me know. I was wondering if this was the case, but
> then I saw that the deletion of IPv6 routes are announced (when
> running "ip link set dev X down") and assumed that message storms was
> (is?) not considered a problem.

I really wish IPV6 wouldn't be inconsistent and behave that way.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html