netdev - Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 16 (net/sched/em

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <525F2D7D.7010708@infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:21:17 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC:	Vitaly Lavrov <lve@...p.ru>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 16 (net/sched/em_ipset.c)

On 10/16/13 15:39, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:48:32 -0700
> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 10/16/13 11:51, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
>>> repository below:
>>>
>>>         git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
>>>
>>> A next-20131016 tag is also provided for convenience.
>>>
>>> Gained two new conflicts, but nothing too exciting. x86 and ARM default
>>> configurations as well as the x86 allmodconfig mostly build fine on the
>>> final tree. There was a failure for the ARM at91x40_defconfig, but the
>>> proper fix wasn't immediately obvious to me, so I've left it broken for
>>> now.
>>
>> on i386, when CONFIG_NET_NS is not enabled:
>>
>> net/sched/em_ipset.c: In function 'em_ipset_change':
>> net/sched/em_ipset.c:27:36: error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'nd_net'
>> net/sched/em_ipset.c: In function 'em_ipset_destroy':
>> net/sched/em_ipset.c:49:34: error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'nd_net'
>>
>>
> 
> I think this should fix.
> 

That works.  Thanks.

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>


> 
> 
> --- a/net/sched/em_ipset.c	2013-10-06 14:48:25.030449222 -0700
> +++ b/net/sched/em_ipset.c	2013-10-16 15:38:05.030278287 -0700
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static int em_ipset_change(struct tcf_pr
>  {
>  	struct xt_set_info *set = data;
>  	ip_set_id_t index;
> -	struct net *net = qdisc_dev(tp->q)->nd_net;
> +	struct net *net = dev_net(qdisc_dev(tp->q));
>  
>  	if (data_len != sizeof(*set))
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static void em_ipset_destroy(struct tcf_
>  {
>  	const struct xt_set_info *set = (const void *) em->data;
>  	if (set) {
> -		ip_set_nfnl_put(qdisc_dev(p->q)->nd_net, set->index);
> +		ip_set_nfnl_put(dev_net(qdisc_dev(p->q)), set->index);
>  		kfree((void *) em->data);
>  	}
>  }
> --


-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html