[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131017110149.GA6747@unicorn.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:01:49 +0200
From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec] xfrm: prevent ipcomp scratch buffer race condition
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:32:05PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 06:03:34PM +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
>
> > Add similar protection into ipcomp_decompress() as it can be
> > called from process context as well (even if such scenario seems
> > a bit artificial).
>
> I don't think this is possible or otherwise xfrm_input will
> dead-lock.
When I was thinking about this, I came with two situations when this
might IMHO happen:
1. We are sending a packet to ourselves; this could mean not only a
local loop but also e.g. a packets between an LXC container and the host
or between two LXC containers. While it doesn't make much sense to use
compression in such case, it might happen while testing a solution which
is going to be used in a normal setup later.
2. The packet was passed to tun/tap device by a userspace application.
Am I wrong?
Michal Kubecek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists