netdev - Re: [net-next 11/14] i40e: reorder block declarations in debugfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131018.133810.644337234048520007.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:38:10 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Cc:	sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com, a@...r.kernel.org,
	shannon.nelson@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com,
	sassmann@...hat.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 11/14] i40e: reorder block declarations in debugfs

From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 07:34:52 -0700

> On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 18:13 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> On 18-10-2013 17:23, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
>> 
>> > From: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...el.com>
>> 
>> > This is a cleanup of the arguments declared at the beginning
>> > of each function.
>> 
>>     I hope you meant "local variables" because "arguments" are the
>> values 
>> passed to a function.
> 
> Yes, he meant local variables.

There is probably going to be some other feedback to address, so please
fix this commit message when you respin this series.

Thanks Jeff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html