[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <526231E0.6060903@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 09:16:48 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: pablo@...filter.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: xtables: lightweight process control
group matching
On 10/19/2013 01:21 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> I am coming to this late. But two concrete suggestions.
>
> 1) process groups and sessions don't change as frequently as pids.
>
> 2) It is possible to put a set of processes in their own network
> namespace and pipe just the packets you want those processes to
> use into that network namespace. Using an ingress queueing filter
> makes that process very efficient even if you have to filter by port.
Actually in our case we're filtering outgoing traffic, based on which
local socket that originated from; so you wouldn't need all of that
construct. Also, you wouldn't even need to have an a-prio knowledge of
the application internals regarding their use of particular use of ports
or protocols. I don't think that such a setup will have the same
efficiency, ease of use, and power to distinguish the application the
traffic came from in such a lightweight, protocol independent and easy way.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists