netdev - Re: [PATCH net 2/3] ipv6: fill rt6i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131021.184205.2063781996744790668.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:42:05 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ja@....bg
Cc:	hannes@...essinduktion.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/3] ipv6: fill rt6i_gateway with nexthop address

From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:31:06 +0300 (EEST)

> 	Thanks for the review! I don't mind too about
> removing rt6_nexthop. For me it is 51% against 49% to keep it
> as it denotes the places that use nexthop and not gateway.
> May be more opinions will help to decide because I don't know
> if there are any plans to use similar techniques as done for IPv4.

I have no strong opinion about removing rt6_nexthop.

If it is of low cost today and makes the code easier to
undersand and grep, just leave it alone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html