[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.03.1310211009270.1522@ssi.bg>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:31:06 +0300 (EEST)
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/3] ipv6: fill rt6i_gateway with nexthop address
Hello,
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 03:43:04PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > Make sure rt6i_gateway contains nexthop information in
> > all routes returned from lookup or when routes are directly
> > attached to skb for generated ICMP packets.
> >
> > The effect of this patch should be a faster version of
> > rt6_nexthop() and the consideration of local addresses as
> > nexthop.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
>
> The patch is fine. I don't mind if we leave it as is or remove rt6_nexthop,
> so:
>
> Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Thanks for the review! I don't mind too about
removing rt6_nexthop. For me it is 51% against 49% to keep it
as it denotes the places that use nexthop and not gateway.
May be more opinions will help to decide because I don't know
if there are any plans to use similar techniques as done for IPv4.
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists