| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:48:30 +0200
From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jiri@...nulli.us, dingtianhong@...wei.com,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2] bonding: move bond-specific init after enslave happens
As Jiri noted, currently we first do all bonding-specific initialization
(specifically - bond_select_active_slave(bond)) before we actually attach
the slave (so that it becomes visible through bond_for_each_slave() and
friends). This might result in bond_select_active_slave() not seeing the
first/new slave and, thus, not actually selecting an active slave.
Fix this by moving all the bond-related init part after we've actually
completely initialized and linked (via bond_master_upper_dev_link()) the
new slave.
Also, remove the bond_(de/a)ttach_slave(), it's useless to have functions
to ++/-- one int.
After this we have all the initialization of the new slave *before*
linking, and all the stuff that needs to be done on bonding *after* it. It
has also a bonus effect - we can remove the locking on the new slave init
completely, and only use it for bond_select_active_slave().
Reported-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
---
Notes:
v1 -> v2:
Move the bond_(de/a)ttach_slave() functionality, and remove these
functions.
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 65 +++++++++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index d90734f..2daa066 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -967,33 +967,6 @@ void bond_select_active_slave(struct bonding *bond)
}
}
-/*--------------------------- slave list handling ---------------------------*/
-
-/*
- * This function attaches the slave to the end of list.
- *
- * bond->lock held for writing by caller.
- */
-static void bond_attach_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_slave)
-{
- bond->slave_cnt++;
-}
-
-/*
- * This function detaches the slave from the list.
- * WARNING: no check is made to verify if the slave effectively
- * belongs to <bond>.
- * Nothing is freed on return, structures are just unchained.
- * If any slave pointer in bond was pointing to <slave>,
- * it should be changed by the calling function.
- *
- * bond->lock held for writing by caller.
- */
-static void bond_detach_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave)
-{
- bond->slave_cnt--;
-}
-
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
static inline int slave_enable_netpoll(struct slave *slave)
{
@@ -1471,22 +1444,13 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
goto err_close;
}
- write_lock_bh(&bond->lock);
-
prev_slave = bond_last_slave(bond);
- bond_attach_slave(bond, new_slave);
new_slave->delay = 0;
new_slave->link_failure_count = 0;
- write_unlock_bh(&bond->lock);
-
- bond_compute_features(bond);
-
bond_update_speed_duplex(new_slave);
- read_lock(&bond->lock);
-
new_slave->last_arp_rx = jiffies -
(msecs_to_jiffies(bond->params.arp_interval) + 1);
for (i = 0; i < BOND_MAX_ARP_TARGETS; i++)
@@ -1547,12 +1511,9 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
}
}
- write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-
switch (bond->params.mode) {
case BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP:
bond_set_slave_inactive_flags(new_slave);
- bond_select_active_slave(bond);
break;
case BOND_MODE_8023AD:
/* in 802.3ad mode, the internal mechanism
@@ -1578,7 +1539,6 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
case BOND_MODE_ALB:
bond_set_active_slave(new_slave);
bond_set_slave_inactive_flags(new_slave);
- bond_select_active_slave(bond);
break;
default:
pr_debug("This slave is always active in trunk mode\n");
@@ -1596,10 +1556,6 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
break;
} /* switch(bond_mode) */
- write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-
- bond_set_carrier(bond);
-
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
slave_dev->npinfo = bond->dev->npinfo;
if (slave_dev->npinfo) {
@@ -1614,8 +1570,6 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
}
#endif
- read_unlock(&bond->lock);
-
res = netdev_rx_handler_register(slave_dev, bond_handle_frame,
new_slave);
if (res) {
@@ -1629,6 +1583,17 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
goto err_unregister;
}
+ bond->slave_cnt++;
+ bond_compute_features(bond);
+ bond_set_carrier(bond);
+
+ if (USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode)) {
+ read_lock(&bond->lock);
+ write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
+ bond_select_active_slave(bond);
+ write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
+ read_unlock(&bond->lock);
+ }
pr_info("%s: enslaving %s as a%s interface with a%s link.\n",
bond_dev->name, slave_dev->name,
@@ -1648,7 +1613,6 @@ err_detach:
vlan_vids_del_by_dev(slave_dev, bond_dev);
write_lock_bh(&bond->lock);
- bond_detach_slave(bond, new_slave);
if (bond->primary_slave == new_slave)
bond->primary_slave = NULL;
if (bond->curr_active_slave == new_slave) {
@@ -1686,7 +1650,6 @@ err_free:
kfree(new_slave);
err_undo_flags:
- bond_compute_features(bond);
/* Enslave of first slave has failed and we need to fix master's mac */
if (!bond_has_slaves(bond) &&
ether_addr_equal(bond_dev->dev_addr, slave_dev->dev_addr))
@@ -1740,6 +1703,9 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,
write_unlock_bh(&bond->lock);
+ /* release the slave from its bond */
+ bond->slave_cnt--;
+
bond_upper_dev_unlink(bond_dev, slave_dev);
/* unregister rx_handler early so bond_handle_frame wouldn't be called
* for this slave anymore.
@@ -1764,9 +1730,6 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,
bond->current_arp_slave = NULL;
- /* release the slave from its bond */
- bond_detach_slave(bond, slave);
-
if (!all && !bond->params.fail_over_mac) {
if (ether_addr_equal(bond_dev->dev_addr, slave->perm_hwaddr) &&
bond_has_slaves(bond))
--
1.8.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists