netdev - Re: [PATCH net] bridge: clean the nf_bridge status when forwarding the skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <526541A0.4000504@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:00:48 -0400
From:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
To:	Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...hcoding.com>
CC:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...n-mesh.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bridge: clean the nf_bridge status when forwarding
 the skb

On 10/18/2013 11:41 AM, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:33:06AM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>> On 10/18/2013 10:46 AM, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:32:09AM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>>>> On 10/18/2013 07:35 AM, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:10:41PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 01:37:35PM +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 04:28:57AM -0700, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem I was having was due to an skb entering br0 first and br1 later.
>>>>> When reaching br1 skb->nf_bridge was != NULL because of the previous processing
>>>>> in br0.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't br_nf_pre_routing already take care of this for you?  It will
>>>> drop the ref on the current nf_bridge and allocate a new one.  Is that
>>>> not sufficient?
>>>
>>> In my case that line is not reached because
>>>
>>>    700         if (!IS_IP(skb) && !IS_VLAN_IP(skb) && !IS_PPPOE_IP(skb))
>>>
>>> is always true: the packet getting analysed is a batman-adv encapsulated packet,
>>> which does not match any of the three above.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>
>> Looking at other encapsulators (PPP, iptunnel, VXLAN), they do
>> nf_reset() on input.  Would that be appropriate for batman as well?
>
> I thought that too.
>
> But at this point, wouldn't it be better to do a reset here and remove the other
> resets from any other encapsulation module?
>
> Maybe this operation is supposed to not happen if no encapsulation is involved?

This is exactly right.  The reset happens much later if there is no 
encapsulation.  However, if there is an encapsuation that changes the 
hader values that are used to filter, then nf_reset has to happen.
That is why nf_reset happens input to the encapsulation layer instead
of always on output from bridge.

-vlad

> I thought that polishing the nf state when exiting the nf related path was a
> clean and easy solution.
>
> Moreover we avoid that any newly implemented tunneling module hit this problem again.
>
>
> Cheers,
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html