[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1382373005.3284.61.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:30:05 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
Cc: Jimmy Perchet <jimmy.perchet@...rot.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/5] net:stmmac: asynchronous tx_clean
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 15:52 +0200, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
> Hello Jimmy
>
> On 10/16/2013 5:24 PM, Jimmy Perchet wrote:
> > Tx descriptor's cleanup and preparation are serialized, which is not necessary
> > and decrease performance.
> > In addition TX descriptor's cleanup is performed on NET_RX softirq, this is
> > confusing.
>
> hmm, here you are changing the logic behind the tx/rx processes.
>
> As done in many drivers, the stmmac cleans the tx resources in
> NAPI context and this is not a confuse approach ;-).
>
> It gave me some performance improvements especially on TCP benchmarks.
>
> > This patch unserialize tx descriptor's cleanup and preparation
> > and defer cleanup in workqueue.
>
> So you decide to use workqueue and I kindly ask you to give me more
> details about the performance improvements (UDP/TCP) and cpu usage.
>
> I can try to do some tests on my side too. This could take a while
> unfortunately.
Anyway this patch is buggy.
1) Removing tx_lock spinlock in TX completion adds a race in
stmmac_xmit()
2) Generally speaking, we should not rely on a work queue to perform TX
completions.
Think about being flooded by incoming frames.
Work queue could never be scheduled.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists