netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: wan: sbni: remove assembly crc32 code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131022.143839.2085832416728125724.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:38:39 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	sebastian@...akpoint.cc
Cc:	andi@...stfloor.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wan: sbni: remove assembly crc32 code

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:36:25 +0200

> 
> There is also a C function doing the same thing. Unless the asm code is
> 110% faster we could stick to the C function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
> ---
> 
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 01:59:28PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> 
>> Is it really impossible to use the generic crc32 support instead of this
>> unsightly custom inline assembler?
> 
> Since you asked for this here step 1.

If it's that simple, this is definitely what we should do.

On the off chance, is there anyone actually able to test this
change? :-)))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html