netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] [PATCH resubmit] ax88179_178a: Correct the RX error definition in RX header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131022.021546.1648298758048784147.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 22 Oct 2013 02:15:46 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	freddy@...x.com.tw
Cc:	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, allan@...x.com.tw, louis@...x.com.tw
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [PATCH resubmit] ax88179_178a: Correct the RX
 error definition in RX header


Submit these, not individually as single patches, but as a patch set,
the first one with subject "[PATCH 1/2]" and the second with
subject "[PATCH 2/2]"

You have to do this, because it is absolutely essentially to let
me know which patch gets applies first and which one gets applied
second.  The two patches are to the same file, so if you don't
tell me the order, they won't apply cleanly at all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html