[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52677F30.1070800@6wind.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:48:00 +0200
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic dev_set_promiscuity->__dev_notify_flags
Le 23/10/2013 07:34, Alexei Starovoitov a écrit :
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 at 01:04 GMT, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> packet_notifier() does rcu_read_lock() before calling into packet_dev_mc() .
>>>
>>> Not sure how to fix it cleanly, other than disabling a notify here.
>>> Any suggestion?
>>>
>>
>> Passing a gfp flag to rtmsg_ifinfo() seems a right fix for me, but I don't
>> know if there is other better way to fix it.
>
> Indeed. rtnl_notify() already accepts gfp_t.
>
> The following diff fixes it for me:
> ---
> include/linux/rtnetlink.h | 3 ++-
> net/core/dev.c | 2 +-
> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
> index f28544b..0180523 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
> @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ extern int rtnetlink_put_metrics(struct sk_buff
> *skb, u32 *metrics);
> extern int rtnl_put_cacheinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct dst_entry *dst,
> u32 id, long expires, u32 error);
>
> -extern void rtmsg_ifinfo(int type, struct net_device *dev, unsigned change);
> +void __rtmsg_ifinfo(int type, struct net_device *dev, unsigned
> change, gfp_t flags);
Just nitpiking: putting the type and the name on the same line is better
'unsigned change'.
> +void rtmsg_ifinfo(int type, struct net_device *dev, unsigned change);
>
> /* RTNL is used as a global lock for all changes to network configuration */
> extern void rtnl_lock(void);
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 0918aad..59b90fe 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -5257,7 +5257,7 @@ void __dev_notify_flags(struct net_device *dev,
> unsigned int old_flags,
> unsigned int changes = dev->flags ^ old_flags;
>
> if (gchanges)
> - rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, dev, gchanges);
> + __rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, dev, gchanges, GFP_ATOMIC);
>
> if (changes & IFF_UP) {
> if (dev->flags & IFF_UP)
> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> index 4aedf03..5931af9 100644
> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> @@ -1984,14 +1984,15 @@ static int rtnl_dump_all(struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct netlink_callback *cb)
> return skb->len;
> }
>
> -void rtmsg_ifinfo(int type, struct net_device *dev, unsigned int change)
> +void __rtmsg_ifinfo(int type, struct net_device *dev, unsigned int change,
> + gfp_t flags)
'gfp_t flags' should be aligned with 'int type'
> {
> struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> int err = -ENOBUFS;
> size_t if_info_size;
>
> - skb = nlmsg_new((if_info_size = if_nlmsg_size(dev, 0)), GFP_KERNEL);
> + skb = nlmsg_new((if_info_size = if_nlmsg_size(dev, 0)), flags);
> if (skb == NULL)
> goto errout;
>
> @@ -2002,12 +2003,17 @@ void rtmsg_ifinfo(int type, struct net_device
> *dev, unsigned int change)
> kfree_skb(skb);
> goto errout;
> }
> - rtnl_notify(skb, net, 0, RTNLGRP_LINK, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> + rtnl_notify(skb, net, 0, RTNLGRP_LINK, NULL, flags);
> return;
> errout:
> if (err < 0)
> rtnl_set_sk_err(net, RTNLGRP_LINK, err);
> }
> +
> +void rtmsg_ifinfo(int type, struct net_device *dev, unsigned int change)
> +{
> + __rtmsg_ifinfo(type, dev, change, GFP_KERNEL);
> +}
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtmsg_ifinfo);
>
> static int nlmsg_populate_fdb_fill(struct sk_buff *skb,
> --
>
> Nicolas, I've sent you my .config.
I got some pb with my testbed, hence I still didn't reproduce the bug.
I will make more test today, but I think this is the right patch.
> Any better ideas?
No and the patch is right for me (__dev_set_promiscuity() call
audit_log(..., GFP_ATOMIC) already).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists