[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1382645088.7572.66.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:04:48 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, ncardwell@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
panweiping3@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: fix SYNACK RTT estimation in Fast Open
On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 08:44 -0700, Yuchung Cheng wrote:
> tp->lsndtime may not always be the SYNACK timestamp if a passive
> Fast Open socket sends data before handshake completes. And if the
> remote acknowledges both the data and the SYNACK, the RTT sample
> is already taken in tcp_ack(), so no need to call
> tcp_update_ack_rtt() in tcp_synack_rtt_meas() aagain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> index a16b01b..305cd05 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> @@ -2871,14 +2871,19 @@ static inline bool tcp_ack_update_rtt(struct sock *sk, const int flag,
> }
>
> /* Compute time elapsed between (last) SYNACK and the ACK completing 3WHS. */
> -static void tcp_synack_rtt_meas(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req)
> +static void tcp_synack_rtt_meas(struct sock *sk, const u32 synack_stamp)
> {
> struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
> s32 seq_rtt = -1;
>
> - if (tp->lsndtime && !tp->total_retrans)
> - seq_rtt = tcp_time_stamp - tp->lsndtime;
> - tcp_ack_update_rtt(sk, FLAG_SYN_ACKED, seq_rtt, -1);
> + if (synack_stamp && !tp->total_retrans)
> + seq_rtt = tcp_time_stamp - synack_stamp;
> +
> + /* If the ACK acks both the SYNACK and the (Fast Open'd) data packets
> + * sent in SYN_RECV, SYNACK RTT is the smooth RTT computed in tcp_ack()
> + */
> + if (!tp->srtt)
> + tcp_ack_update_rtt(sk, FLAG_SYN_ACKED, seq_rtt, -1);
> }
>
> static void tcp_cong_avoid(struct sock *sk, u32 ack, u32 in_flight)
> @@ -5587,6 +5592,7 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct request_sock *req;
> int queued = 0;
> bool acceptable;
> + u32 synack_stamp;
>
> tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
>
> @@ -5669,9 +5675,11 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> * so release it.
> */
> if (req) {
> + synack_stamp = tcp_rsk(req)->snt_synack;
>
Alternative would have been to set here :
tp->lsndtime = tcp_rsk(req)->snt_synack;
Because it seems TCP_INFO can return quite bogus data anyway in
info->tcpi_last_data_sent = jiffies_to_msecs(now - tp->lsndtime);
> tp->total_retrans = req->num_retrans;
> reqsk_fastopen_remove(sk, req, false);
> } else {
> + synack_stamp = tp->lsndtime;
> /* Make sure socket is routed, for correct metrics. */
> icsk->icsk_af_ops->rebuild_header(sk);
> tcp_init_congestion_control(sk);
> @@ -5694,7 +5702,7 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> tp->snd_una = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ack_seq;
> tp->snd_wnd = ntohs(th->window) << tp->rx_opt.snd_wscale;
> tcp_init_wl(tp, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq);
> - tcp_synack_rtt_meas(sk, req);
> + tcp_synack_rtt_meas(sk, synack_stamp);
>
> if (tp->rx_opt.tstamp_ok)
> tp->advmss -= TCPOLEN_TSTAMP_ALIGNED;
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists