[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <526912C1.6070502@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 20:29:53 +0800
From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
To: wangweidong <wangweidong1@...wei.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
<bfields@...ldses.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PACTH net-next] SUNRPC: remove an unnecessary if statement
On 2013/10/24 10:35, wangweidong wrote:
> If req allocated failed just goto out_free, no need to check the
> 'i < num_prealloc'. There is just code simplification, no
> functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@...wei.com>
> ---
> net/sunrpc/xprt.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
> index 095363e..a8e20de 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
> @@ -1087,11 +1087,9 @@ struct rpc_xprt *xprt_alloc(struct net *net, size_t size,
> for (i = 0; i < num_prealloc; i++) {
> req = kzalloc(sizeof(struct rpc_rqst), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!req)
> - break;
> + goto out_free;
> list_add(&req->rq_list, &xprt->free);
> }
> - if (i < num_prealloc)
> - goto out_free;
> if (max_alloc > num_prealloc)
> xprt->max_reqs = max_alloc;
> else
> -- 1.7.12
>
>
Acked-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
>
>
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists