netdev - Re: vxlan gso is broken by stackable gso

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1382661707.7572.73.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:41:47 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: vxlan gso is broken by stackable gso_segment()

On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 16:37 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> Hi Eric, Stephen,
> 
> it seems commit 3347c960 "ipv4: gso: make inet_gso_segment() stackable"
> broke vxlan gso
> 
> the way to reproduce:
> start two lxc with veth and bridge between them
> create vxlan dev in both containers
> do iperf
> 
> this setup on net-next does ~80 Mbps and a lot of tcp retransmits.
> reverting 3347c960 and d3e5e006 gets performance back to ~230 Mbps
> 
> I guess vxlan driver suppose to set encap_level ? Some other way?

Hi Alexei

Are the GRE tunnels broken as well for you ?

In my testings, GRE was working, and it looks GRE and vxlan has quite
similar gso implementation.

Maybe you can capture some of the broken frames with tcpdump ?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html