[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <526A2AAC.4060809@alphalink.fr>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:24:12 +0200
From: François Cachereul <f.cachereul@...halink.fr>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
CC: James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] ppp: Allow ppp device connected to an l2tp
session to change of namespace
On 10/24/2013 05:53 PM, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 04:43:42PM +0100, James Chapman wrote:
>> I'm thinking about the implications of a skb in the net namespace of the
>> ppp interface passing through a tunnel socket which is in another
>> namespace. I think net namespaces are completely isolated.
>>
>> To keep your ppp interfaces isolated from each other, have you
>> considered using netfilter to prevent data being passed between ppp
>> interfaces?
>
> Using network namespaces for this is far more efficient. We've already
> added support for doing this to other tunneling interfaces. This approach
> also makes creating VPNs where there is re-use of the private address space
> between different customers far easier to implement.
>
> -ben
That's indeed on of the problems we have to deal with and net namespaces
seems to be the right answer.
François
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists