[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131027123701.7581550b@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:37:01 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: anirup dutta <adutta2@...edu>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Netem Delay Normal Distribution
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 21:31:03 -0500
anirup dutta <adutta2@...edu> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I try this on my device
>
> sudo tc qdisc del dev eth0 root netem delay 100ms 20ms distribution normal
>
> I use iperf for transmitting UDP packets and I modified its code to
> get per packet delay. When I plot the distribution of delays and
> analyze the delays they pass the normality tests.
>
> The only problem that I am not able to understand is that the mean of
> those delays shift to 125ms. Its not only me. There was another study
> and it observed the same thing.
>
> http://www.researchgate.net/publication/224256550_An_Empirical_Study_of_NetEm_Network_Emulation_Functionalities/file/d912f5058c9b1e409b.pdf
>
> Figure 7
>
> I found out that this command is valid
>
> sudo tc qdisc del dev eth0 root netem delay 1ms 20ms distribution normal
>
> So I have a feeling that mean gets shifted from the base delay to
> avoid negative delay values.
>
> It would be great if someone can confirm how it is implemented?
The table distribution logic actually predates netem.
It came from NIST Net http://snad.ncsl.nist.gov/nistnet/
The code was direct copy from this public domain code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists