[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131028.204658.118867242681438729.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:46:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hannes@...essinduktion.org
Cc: dcbw@...hat.com, jiri@...nulli.us, vyasevich@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net, thaller@...hat.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] ipv6: allow userspace to create address with
IFLA_F_TEMPORARY flag
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 01:13:40 +0100
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:08:10PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
>> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:16:19 -0500
>>
>> > On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 17:17 -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> > First off, what's the reasoning behind having IPv6 privacy as a config
>> > option? It's off-by-default and must be explicitly turned on, so is
>> > there any harm in removing the config? Or is it just for
>> > smallest-kernel-ever folks?
>>
>> I think it's for "smallest kernel ever" stuff. Even every arch
>> defconfig that mentions it has it enabled :-)
>>
>> Maybe it was optional initially because the code was new and
>> experimental'ish. I don't know.
>>
>> Regardless of the reason I think it only obfuscates the code with
>> ifdefs right now and I would be happy to see it disappear.
>>
>> Any objections to this patch?
>
> Yeah, I changed my mind. The ifdefs are really hideous. Fine for me.
Ok, pushed to net-next.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists