[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131029115617.GA16615@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:56:17 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, pablo@...filter.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: IPV6 nf defrag does not work
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> On the current net-next if you on HOSTA do:
> ip6tables -I INPUT -p icmpv6 -j DROP
> ip6tables -I INPUT -p icmpv6 -m icmp6 --icmpv6-type 128 -j ACCEPT
>
> and on HOSTB you do:
> ping6 HOSTA -s2000 (MTU is 1500)
>
> Only the first ICMP echo request will be passed through, the rest is not
> passed on HOSTA. This issue does not occur with smaller packets than MTU (where
> fragmentation does not happen).
>
> I'm trying to find out where the problem is.
Are you sure this is new behaviour? As far back as I can remember
it was always like this.
in ip6tables, the individual fragments are sent through the ruleset,
iow. you'll need to make use of '-m conntrack' to match the fragments
belonging to an existing connection.
I don't know why this is, and I don't like this either.
But this is how it was implemented, see
net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv6_hooks.c, ipv6_defrag() ->
nf_ct_frag6_output()
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists