[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131030112405.GA8204@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 12:24:05 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc: Luciano Coelho <luca@...lho.fi>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, freemangordon@....bg,
aaro.koskinen@....fi, sre@...g0.de, joni.lapilainen@...il.com,
David Gnedt <david.gnedt@...izone.at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] wl1251: fix scan behaviour while not associated
On Sat 2013-10-26 22:34:01, Pali Rohár wrote:
> From: David Gnedt <david.gnedt@...izone.at>
>
> With a dissacociated card I often encoutered very long scan delays.
>
> My guess is that it has something to do with the cards DTIM handling and
> another firmware bug mentioned in the TI WLAN driver, which is described as
> the card may never end scanning if the channel is overloaded because it
> can't send probe requests. I think the firmware somehow also tries to
> receive DTIM messages when the BSSID is not set. Therefore most of the time
> it waits for DTIM messages and can't do scanning work.
>
> Anyway we can workaround this misbehaviour by setting the HIGH_PRIORITY
> bit for scans in disassociated state.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gnedt <david.gnedt@...izone.at>
I guess you should add your Signed-off-by: here (as you are sending
the patch forward).
Other than that:
Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists