[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1383163976.4857.61.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:12:56 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
hkchu@...gle.com, mwdalton@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: introduce gro_frag_list_enable sysctl
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 20:05 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 12:53 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 19:39 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > > I think the change to enable mega-GRO packets should be reverted and
> > > that change should go to stable so that the performance regression for
> > > forwarding is also fixed.
> >
> > What are you talking about ?
> >
> > The change is in net-next only.
> >
> > It seems a lot of people talk, but few people try to help.
>
> Sorry :-/
>
Sorry, my last sentence was harsh.
I meant that patch was sent October 8th, and bug discovered only 2 days
ago. I sent two patches to fix the bug, and will send other patches as
well, so asking for a revert is I think premature, give me some time
to make forward progress ;)
Thanks !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists