lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1383095486-5215-3-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au>
Date:	Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:11:26 +0900
From:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc:	lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>,
	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Subject: [PATCH nf-next 2/2] net: ipvs: sctp: do not recalc sctp csum when ports didn't change

From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>

Unlike UDP or TCP, we do not take the pseudo-header into
account in SCTP checksums. So in case port mapping is the
very same, we do not need to recalculate the whole SCTP
checksum in software, which is very expensive.

Also, similarly as in TCP, take into account when a private
helper mangled the packet. In that case, we also need to
recalculate the checksum even if ports might be same.

Thanks for feedback regarding skb->ip_summed checks from
Julian Anastasov; here's a discussion on these checks for
snat and dnat:

* For snat_handler(), we can see CHECKSUM_PARTIAL from
  virtual devices, and from LOCAL_OUT, otherwise it
  should be CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY. In general, in snat it
  is more complex. skb contains the original route and
  ip_vs_route_me_harder() can change the route after
  snat_handler. So, for locally generated replies from
  local server we can not preserve the CHECKSUM_PARTIAL
  mode. It is an chicken or egg dilemma: snat_handler
  needs the device after rerouting (to check for
  NETIF_F_SCTP_CSUM), while ip_route_me_harder() wants
  the snat_handler() to put the new saddr for proper
  rerouting.

* For dnat_handler(), we should not see CHECKSUM_COMPLETE
  for SCTP, in fact the small set of drivers that support
  SCTP offloading return CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY on correctly
  received SCTP csum. We can see CHECKSUM_PARTIAL from
  local stack or received from virtual drivers. The idea is
  that SCTP decides to avoid csum calculation if hardware
  supports offloading. IPVS can change the device after
  rerouting to real server but we can preserve the
  CHECKSUM_PARTIAL mode if the new device supports
  offloading too. This works because skb dst is changed
  before dnat_handler and we see the new device. So, checks
  in the 'if' part will decide whether it is ok to keep
  CHECKSUM_PARTIAL for the output. If the packet was with
  CHECKSUM_NONE, hence we deal with unknown checksum. As we
  recalculate the sum for IP header in all cases, it should
  be safe to use CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY. We can forward wrong
  checksum in this case (without cp->app). In case of
  CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY, the csum was valid on receive.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
---
 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
index 9ca7aa0..2f7ea75 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ sctp_snat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
 {
 	sctp_sctphdr_t *sctph;
 	unsigned int sctphoff = iph->len;
+	bool payload_csum = false;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
 	if (cp->af == AF_INET6 && iph->fragoffs)
@@ -92,19 +93,31 @@ sctp_snat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
 		return 0;
 
 	if (unlikely(cp->app != NULL)) {
+		int ret;
+
 		/* Some checks before mangling */
 		if (pp->csum_check && !pp->csum_check(cp->af, skb, pp))
 			return 0;
 
 		/* Call application helper if needed */
-		if (!ip_vs_app_pkt_out(cp, skb))
+		ret = ip_vs_app_pkt_out(cp, skb);
+		if (ret == 0)
 			return 0;
+		/* ret=2: csum update is needed after payload mangling */
+		if (ret == 2)
+			payload_csum = true;
 	}
 
 	sctph = (void *) skb_network_header(skb) + sctphoff;
-	sctph->source = cp->vport;
 
-	sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
+	/* Only update csum if we really have to */
+	if (sctph->source != cp->vport || payload_csum ||
+	    skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
+		sctph->source = cp->vport;
+		sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
+	} else {
+		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
+	}
 
 	return 1;
 }
@@ -115,6 +128,7 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
 {
 	sctp_sctphdr_t *sctph;
 	unsigned int sctphoff = iph->len;
+	bool payload_csum = false;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
 	if (cp->af == AF_INET6 && iph->fragoffs)
@@ -126,19 +140,32 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
 		return 0;
 
 	if (unlikely(cp->app != NULL)) {
+		int ret;
+
 		/* Some checks before mangling */
 		if (pp->csum_check && !pp->csum_check(cp->af, skb, pp))
 			return 0;
 
 		/* Call application helper if needed */
-		if (!ip_vs_app_pkt_in(cp, skb))
+		ret = ip_vs_app_pkt_in(cp, skb);
+		if (ret == 0)
 			return 0;
+		/* ret=2: csum update is needed after payload mangling */
+		if (ret == 2)
+			payload_csum = true;
 	}
 
 	sctph = (void *) skb_network_header(skb) + sctphoff;
-	sctph->dest = cp->dport;
 
-	sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
+	/* Only update csum if we really have to */
+	if (sctph->dest != cp->dport || payload_csum ||
+	    (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL &&
+	     !(skb_dst(skb)->dev->features & NETIF_F_SCTP_CSUM))) {
+		sctph->dest = cp->dport;
+		sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
+	} else if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
+		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
+	}
 
 	return 1;
 }
-- 
1.8.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ