netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 04/11] openvswitch: Restructure datapath.c and flow.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1383096313.12439.44.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:25:13 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	dev@...nvswitch.org, Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/11] openvswitch: Restructure datapath.c and
 flow.c

On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 17:22 -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> Over the time datapath.c and flow.c has became pretty large files.
> Following patch restructures functionality of component into three
> different components:
[]
>  net/openvswitch/Makefile       |    2 +
>  net/openvswitch/datapath.c     |  528 +------------
>  net/openvswitch/datapath.h     |    1 +
>  net/openvswitch/flow.c         | 1605 +---------------------------------------
>  net/openvswitch/flow.h         |  128 +---
>  net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c | 1603 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Is this largish patch any different or easier to
read/verify when generated with git format-patch -M ?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html