[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5270DC3A.6040206@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 12:15:22 +0200
From: Jukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipv6: Add checks for RAWIP ARP type
Hi Alexander,
On 30.10.2013 11:31, Alexander Aring wrote:
> Hi Jukka,
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:11:11AM +0200, Jukka Rissanen wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Jukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
>> index d6ff126..60bf947 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
>> @@ -1783,6 +1783,15 @@ static int addrconf_ifid_ip6tnl(u8 *eui, struct net_device *dev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int addrconf_ifid_rawip(u8 *eui, struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + if (dev->addr_len != 8)
>> + return -1;
>> + memcpy(eui, dev->dev_addr, 8);
>> + eui[0] ^= 2;
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>
> I think we have already a function like this, look for:
>
> static int addrconf_ifid_eui64(u8 *eui, struct net_device *dev)
>
> which is the same for ieee802154 6lowpan. Are there any issues why we
> can't use the same function here?
No issues there, I can certainly prepare a patch that uses the
addrconf_ifid_eui64() instead.
--
Cheers,
Jukka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists