[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1383208814-23476-4-git-send-email-erik.hugne@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:40:14 +0100
From: <erik.hugne@...csson.com>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <jon.maloy@...csson.com>,
<maloy@...jonn.com>, <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
CC: <ying.xue@...driver.com>, Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@...csson.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] tipc: reassembly failures should cause link reset
From: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@...csson.com>
If appending a received fragment to the pending fragment chain
in a unicast link fails, the current code tries to force a retransmission
of the fragment by decrementing the 'next received sequence number'
field in the link. This is done under the assumption that the failure
is caused by an out-of-memory situation, an assumption that does
not hold true after the previous patch in this series.
A failure to append a fragment can now only be caused by a protocol
violation by the sending peer, and it must hence be assumed that it
is either malicious or buggy. Either way, the correct behavior is now
to reset the link instead of trying to revert its sequence number.
So, this is what we do in this commit.
Signed-off-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@...csson.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
---
net/tipc/link.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c
index e2b347a..a6c4981 100644
--- a/net/tipc/link.c
+++ b/net/tipc/link.c
@@ -1652,7 +1652,7 @@ deliver:
goto deliver;
}
if (ret == LINK_REASM_ERROR)
- l_ptr->next_in_no--;
+ tipc_link_reset(l_ptr);
tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
continue;
case CHANGEOVER_PROTOCOL:
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists