[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1383232241.4857.73.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:10:41 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: codel: Avoid undefined behavior from
signed overflow
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 15:15 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Okay, I'll cook up another patch, after work.
>
> Adding all the typecheck() stuff, just bloats the code.
>
> Would it be better/okay just to do?:
> (s32)((u32)(a) - (u32)(b)) > 0)
>
>
What about using the existing codel types ?
diff --git a/include/net/codel.h b/include/net/codel.h
index 389cf62..89a7781 100644
--- a/include/net/codel.h
+++ b/include/net/codel.h
@@ -72,7 +72,12 @@ static inline codel_time_t codel_get_time(void)
return ns >> CODEL_SHIFT;
}
-#define codel_time_after(a, b) ((s32)(a) - (s32)(b) > 0)
+static inline bool codel_time_after(codel_time_t a, codel_time_t b)
+{
+ codel_tdiff_t delta = a - b;
+
+ return delta >= 0;
+}
#define codel_time_after_eq(a, b) ((s32)(a) - (s32)(b) >= 0)
#define codel_time_before(a, b) ((s32)(a) - (s32)(b) < 0)
#define codel_time_before_eq(a, b) ((s32)(a) - (s32)(b) <= 0)
You need of course something similar for all variants.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists