[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131101111957.GA30284@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:19:57 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Duan Jiong <duanj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: host should probe those non-reachable router
Hi Duan!
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 10:47:15AM +0800, Duan Jiong wrote:
>
> rather than those routers that the return value of rt6_score_route()
> is RT6_NUD_SUCCEED.
>
> Signed-off-by: Duan Jiong <duanj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/route.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index 1ac0b6e..b7bf5c7 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -623,12 +623,11 @@ static struct rt6_info *find_match(struct rt6_info *rt, int oif, int strict,
> match_do_rr = true;
> m = 0; /* lowest valid score */
> } else if (m < 0) {
> + if (strict & RT6_LOOKUP_F_REACHABLE)
> + rt6_probe(rt);
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if (strict & RT6_LOOKUP_F_REACHABLE)
> - rt6_probe(rt);
> -
I don't think this is correct. m < 0 are the routers we really don't want to
use, e.g. because we get a failure signaled from rt6_check_dev. E.g. we want
to query a route where a specified interface id is given.
In case router preference is enabled we mostly give back RT6_NUD_SUCCEED for
routes which are somewhat reachable. Really broken routers in NUD_FAILED state
are waiting for cleanup and recreation. We also do not accept new NAs on
neighbours in NUD_FAILED state IIRC.
Greetings,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists