[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131103122824.GA17394@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 20:28:24 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
hkchu@...gle.com, mwdalton@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] net: introduce dev_set_forwarding()
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 07:01:37AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> Christoph Paasch and Jerry Chu reported crashes in skb_segment() caused
> by commit 8a29111c7ca6 ("net: gro: allow to build full sized skb")
>
> skb_segment() only deals with a frag_list chain containing MSS sized
> fragments. Even if we fix this problem, its better if GRO layer
> doesn't build skb with a frag_list in the first place, to let TSO
> packets reaching output devices.
>
> David Miller and Ben Hutchings suggested we keep track of number of
> forwarding users to be able to :
>
> - Disable LRO
> - Make sure GRO layer do not use skb frag_list to extend skb capacity
Why are we still doing this instead of fixing skb_segment to
deal with skb frag_list properly?
LRO is legacy code and we should not be adding similar cruft
to GRO.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists