netdev - Re: Bluetooth 6LoWPAN and routing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1383640589.12691.36.camel@jrissane-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 05 Nov 2013 10:36:29 +0200
From:	Jukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Claudio Takahasi <claudio.takahasi@...nbossa.org>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bluetooth 6LoWPAN and routing

Hi Claudio,

On ma, 2013-11-04 at 19:46 -0200, Claudio Takahasi wrote:
> Hi Jukka,
> 
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Jukka Rissanen
> <jukka.rissanen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> >
> > On 24.10.2013 15:25, Alexander Aring wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jukka,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:45:40AM +0300, Jukka Rissanen wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I have been prototyping with BT 6LoWPAN support (using this draft
> >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle-12 as a
> >>> reference). I sent first version yesterday to linux-bluetooth ml
> >>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/39394
> >>>
> >> I see you take many code from the 6lowpan ieee802154 implementation.
> >> (Just notice you drop the original authors from there)
> >
> >
> > Hmm, those got dropped, I am sorry about that. I will add the original
> > authors information of course.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> I have a couple of patches to fix a lot of bugs in the current 6LoWPAN
> >> ieee802154 implementation.
> >>
> >> Some bugs which I found:
> >>
> >>    - Fix race conditions in fragmentation handling
> >>    - Fix UDP compression/uncompressionm, which is completly broken
> >>    - Fragmentation handling isn't rfc4944 compatible
> >>
> >> And some other improvements. I see your rfc has the same issues (e.g.
> >> fragmentation race conditions).
> >>
> >> Currently I preparing these patches for mainlining.
> >
> >
> > Excellent news!
> 
> 
> Is it necessary to implement 6loWPAN fragmentation/reassembling? For
> Bluetooth, I thought L2CAP FAR (Fragmentation and Reassembling) could
> handle the transfer of IPv6 packets that doesn't fit in one single
> BTLE PDU.

Yes, the Bluetooth 6lowpan code I sent handles the L2CAP FAR already.
The question is who handles the IPv6 packets that are larger than
IPV6_MIN_MTU (1280 bytes), or is that automatically done by other parts
of the networking subsystem.

> What am I missing here?
> 
> It seems that some BLE development kits/firmwares don't support FAR on
> L2CAP Basic Mode, but this is another problem that should be fixed
> soon.
> 
> Regards,
> Claudio


Cheers,
Jukka


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html