lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1383661995.4291.137.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Tue, 05 Nov 2013 06:33:15 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Mathias Krause <mathias.krause@...unet.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Dmitry Tarnyagin <dmitry.tarnyagin@...kless.no>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: allow to leave the buffer fragmented
 in skb_cow_data()

On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 14:54 +0100, Mathias Krause wrote:
> Do not linearize the buffer per se but only if we're expected to expand
> the tail. All callers can handle fragmented buffers and even expect
> them!
> 
> Not linearizing the buffer leads to a small performance improvement for
> the IPsec receive path in case the network driver passed us a fragmented
> buffer.
> 
> With this patch applied I was able to increase the throughput of an
> IPsec gateway from 7.12 Gbit/s to 7.28 Gbit/s.

What is the driver you used ?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ