lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1383767241.21999.9.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:47:21 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	hkchu@...gle.com, mwdalton@...gle.com
Subject: Re: gso: Attempt to handle mega-GRO packets

On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 22:39 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:

> In fact, we never relied on the frag_list having headers anyway so
> it's not hard to fix this.
> 
> Still totally untested but at least this has a chance of handling
> the new virtio_net.

First try, machine doesn't crash, but things are not working.

[  433.232553] skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448
[  433.340523] skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448
[  433.340578] skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448
[  433.340598] skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448
[  433.340620] skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448
[  433.340661] skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448<4>[  438.313019] net_ratelimit: 141 callbacks suppressed

To test this, I used a regular forwarding path between three hosts

A --->  B ----> C

I'll try a different way.

The frag_list would contain a bunch of frags, that we logically add to the bunch
of frags found in the first skb shared_info structure.

Thanks


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ