[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1383767241.21999.9.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:47:21 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
hkchu@...gle.com, mwdalton@...gle.com
Subject: Re: gso: Attempt to handle mega-GRO packets
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 22:39 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> In fact, we never relied on the frag_list having headers anyway so
> it's not hard to fix this.
>
> Still totally untested but at least this has a chance of handling
> the new virtio_net.
First try, machine doesn't crash, but things are not working.
[ 433.232553] skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448
[ 433.340523] skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448
[ 433.340578] skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448
[ 433.340598] skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448
[ 433.340620] skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448
[ 433.340661] skbuff: skb_segment: illegal GSO fragment: 1514 1448<4>[ 438.313019] net_ratelimit: 141 callbacks suppressed
To test this, I used a regular forwarding path between three hosts
A ---> B ----> C
I'll try a different way.
The frag_list would contain a bunch of frags, that we logically add to the bunch
of frags found in the first skb shared_info structure.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists