[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5279E740.5050102@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:52:48 +0800
From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/9] bonding: rebuild the lock use for bond_alb_monitor()
The bond_alb_monitor use bond lock to protect the bond slave list,
it is no effect here, we need to use RTNL or RCU to replace bond lock,
the bond_alb_monitor will called 10 times one second, so I think
RTNL is fit here, and move the rtnl to the top of the function, the
RTNL is being used when rlb_enabled is true.
remove the unwanted curr_slave_lock, because the curr_active_slave
will not be changed out the RTNL, so it is safe to sending the learning
packets.
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 33 ++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
index 7870e4e..4ed7fe4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
@@ -1491,11 +1491,13 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
struct list_head *iter;
struct slave *slave;
- read_lock(&bond->lock);
+ if (!rtnl_trylock())
+ goto re_arm;
if (!bond_has_slaves(bond)) {
bond_info->tx_rebalance_counter = 0;
bond_info->lp_counter = 0;
+ rtnl_unlock();
goto re_arm;
}
@@ -1506,24 +1508,17 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
if (bond_info->lp_counter >= BOND_ALB_LP_TICKS(bond)) {
/* change of curr_active_slave involves swapping of mac addresses.
* in order to avoid this swapping from happening while
- * sending the learning packets, the curr_slave_lock must be held for
- * read.
+ * sending the learning packets, the RTNL or curr_slave_lock
+ * must be held for read.
*/
- read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter)
alb_send_learning_packets(slave, slave->dev->dev_addr);
- read_unlock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-
bond_info->lp_counter = 0;
}
/* rebalance tx traffic */
if (bond_info->tx_rebalance_counter >= BOND_TLB_REBALANCE_TICKS) {
-
- read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
tlb_clear_slave(bond, slave, 1);
if (slave == bond->curr_active_slave) {
@@ -1534,8 +1529,6 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
}
}
- read_unlock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-
bond_info->tx_rebalance_counter = 0;
}
@@ -1544,16 +1537,6 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
if (bond_info->primary_is_promisc &&
(++bond_info->rlb_promisc_timeout_counter >= RLB_PROMISC_TIMEOUT)) {
- /*
- * dev_set_promiscuity requires rtnl and
- * nothing else. Avoid race with bond_close.
- */
- read_unlock(&bond->lock);
- if (!rtnl_trylock()) {
- read_lock(&bond->lock);
- goto re_arm;
- }
-
bond_info->rlb_promisc_timeout_counter = 0;
/* If the primary was set to promiscuous mode
@@ -1562,9 +1545,6 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
*/
dev_set_promiscuity(bond->curr_active_slave->dev, -1);
bond_info->primary_is_promisc = 0;
-
- rtnl_unlock();
- read_lock(&bond->lock);
}
if (bond_info->rlb_rebalance) {
@@ -1587,10 +1567,9 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
}
}
+ rtnl_unlock();
re_arm:
queue_delayed_work(bond->wq, &bond->alb_work, alb_delta_in_ticks);
-
- read_unlock(&bond->lock);
}
/* assumption: called before the slave is attached to the bond
--
1.8.2.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists