[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1383750070.4291.163.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 07:01:10 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
hkchu@...gle.com, mwdalton@...gle.com, mst@...hat.com
Subject: Re: gso: Attempt to handle mega-GRO packets
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 21:12 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> I take that back. While the original patch was seriously broken,
> it has since been fixed by the coalescing patch that Jason Wang
> wrote.
>
Patch was not 'broken', but a step into the right direction. I am very
sorry if you think otherwise.
> It's still pretty weird to be dividing page frags into 1500-byte
> chunks and then merging back up to 4K but at least it should do the
> right thing now.
Have you thought about arches having PAGE_SIZE=65536, and how bad it is
to use a full page per network frame ? It is lazy and x86 centered.
So after our patches, we now have an optimal situation, even on these
arches.
On x86, a full 64KB GSO packet will now fit in 2 (or 3) frags allocated
in 32KB pages (order-3) in fast path (ie if there is not high memory
pressure)
According to our tests, performance is better on x86, and virtio_net now
is usable on arches with PAGE_SIZE=65536
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists