[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <527BA63F.7040900@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 06:39:59 -0800
From: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Anton 'EvilMan' Danilov <littlesmilingcloud@...il.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Using HTB over MultiQ
On 11/7/2013 6:20 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 06:11 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 17:12 +0400, Anton 'EvilMan' Danilov wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I'm experimenting with high performance linux router with 10G NICs.
>>> On high traffic rates the performance are limited by the lock of root
>>> queue discipline. For avoid impact of locking i've decided to build
>>> QoS scheme over the multiq qdisc.
>>>
>
> Oh well, this is a router.
>
> So I think you need to change the device queue selection so that it only
> depends on your filters / htb classes.
>
> Otherwise flows for a particular 'customer' might be spread on the 8
> queues, so the rate could be 8 * 1Mbit, instead of 1Mbit.
>
With the multiq qdisc you could attach filter to the root qdisc and use
skbedit to set the queue_mapping field,
#tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 u32 \
match ip dst 192.168.0.3 \
action skbedit queue_mapping 3
if you configure the filters to map to the correct classes this would
work.
Or another way would be use mqprio and steer packets to HTB classes
using the skb->priority. The priority can be set by iptables/nftables
or an ingress filter.
.John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists