[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1383791855.9412.5.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 18:37:35 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
hkchu@...gle.com, mwdalton@...gle.com, mst@...hat.com,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: gso: Attempt to handle mega-GRO packets
On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 10:15 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 06:02:38PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > 4K page will contain 2 frags and they will coalesce.
> >
> > Performance will still be quite good.
> >
> > We probably add a tweak, to not have any hole in this case.
>
> Also have you considered the security aspect of this? If you have
> two skbs sharing a page, and one gets transmitted to a third party
> using zero-copy, the other unrelated skb's content may become visible
> where it shouldn't.
If the hypervisor is doomed, there is nothing we can do.
virtio_net owns the pages, and relies on hypervisor doing the right
thing.
That you use part of the page, is really irrelevant.
It seems you are speaking of virtio_net sending frames, but its about
receiving frames here.
We receive frames, delivered by the trusted hypervisor.
OK, I will shut up now, since apparently I really upset you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists