netdev - Re: gso: Attempt to handle mega-GRO packets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1383808048.9412.31.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Wed, 06 Nov 2013 23:07:28 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	hkchu@...gle.com, mwdalton@...gle.com,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: gso: Attempt to handle mega-GRO packets

On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 07:56 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

> I considered doing this but won't this mean packets can get reordered?
> In practice we need to maintain ordering of RX frames within
> a given flow, correct?

Sorry, I was referring to two pools of frags, instead of a single one.

One pool of frags of (1500 + hdr) bytes
One pool of frags of 4096 bytes

But its still one logical queue.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html