netdev - Re: Using HTB over MultiQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1383923220.9412.236.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Fri, 08 Nov 2013 07:07:00 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Anton 'EvilMan' Danilov <littlesmilingcloud@...il.com>
Cc:	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Using HTB over MultiQ

On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 18:53 +0400, Anton 'EvilMan' Danilov wrote:

> Over 60 percent of 'perf top' is _raw_spin_lock function.
> Speed of traffic is near 6Gbit/s, packet rate ~ 1.3 Mpps. But this
> speed are limited by shaper.

Please post :

ethtool -S eth0  # or other nics

perf record -a -g sleep 10

perf report | tail -n 200

And possibly it would be nice if you send your tc script so that we can
check ;)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html