netdev - Re: Using HTB over MultiQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEzD07LmgvvfNhNuxzwjy7fxLsCBLiofeXJ61qbdOBQCiSRefw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Nov 2013 19:53:57 +0400
From:	"Anton 'EvilMan' Danilov" <littlesmilingcloud@...il.com>
To:	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Using HTB over MultiQ

2013/11/8 John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>:

> perf would be interesting but note that multiq still uses the root qdisc
> lock which you original stated you were trying to avoid.
>
> mq and mqprio are really the only two existing qdiscs that work well for
> performance with small packet sizes and multiqueue nics at least in my
> experience/setup with these kinds of micro-benchmarks.
>
> .John
>

Hm.. I think I need another way to classify packets for using of mq
qdisc, because it don't support classify at root (not supported error
on try attach filter).
On next week i'll try to write ipset extension for setting of priority
and queue_mapping value through the IPSET netfilter target.


-- 
Anton.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html