[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1383929698.3802.24.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:54:58 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Aurelien Guillaume <aurelien@....me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ethtool] Fix iteration count in sff8472_calibration()
On Sun, 2013-09-22 at 02:36 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> We want to iterate over all elements of the various arrays of readings
> (which all have the same dimensions - and maybe ought to be a single
> array). Unfortunately the iteration count is sizeof(sd->bias_cur) and
> bias_cur has 2-byte elements, so we iterate over twice as many
> elements as are really there.
>
> Compiler-detected, and compile-tested only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
> ---
Applied. Thanks, me.
Ben.
> sfpdiag.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sfpdiag.c b/sfpdiag.c
> index f67e491..04fd880 100644
> --- a/sfpdiag.c
> +++ b/sfpdiag.c
> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static void sff8472_calibration(const __u8 *id, struct sff8472_diags *sd)
> __u16 rx_reading;
>
> /* Calibration should occur for all values (threshold and current) */
> - for (i = 0; i < sizeof(sd->bias_cur); ++i) {
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sd->bias_cur); ++i) {
> /*
> * Apply calibration formula 1 (Temp., Voltage, Bias, Tx Power)
> */
>
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists