[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <527E3DC7.3020908@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 21:51:03 +0800
From: Ding Tianhong <dthxman@...il.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
CC: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/10] bonding: rebuild the lock use for bond_mii_monitor()
δΊ 2013/11/8 23:28, Nikolay Aleksandrov ει:
> On 11/08/2013 03:07 AM, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> In fact the bond cannot disappear while this function is running, so this test
> should be able to run outside the RCU region if I'm not missing something :-)
> It'll be just as useful as running inside the region, at most a free run may
> happen if there's one slave and it disappears.
>
>
> This is unnecessary, bond_has_slaves() should be enough. See bond_start_xmit()
> and also the list_empty comment in include/linux/rculist.h for more information why.
> My bond_has_slaves() comments apply to all the patches that use it.
>
>
yes, you are right, I make a silly mistake, the bond list itself is no
need to copy, it
dose not occur any problem if it be changed.
The curr_active_slave needs copy for peer, as it may be changed at
monitor running.
Regards.
Ding
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists