netdev - Re: VLAN filtering/VLAN aware bridge problems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52829E41.6060604@profihost.ag>
Date:	Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:31:45 +0100
From:	Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@...fihost.ag>
To:	vyasevic@...hat.com
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: VLAN filtering/VLAN aware bridge problems

sorry for the very late response.

Am 10.09.2013 16:11, schrieb Vlad Yasevich:
> On 08/30/2013 11:01 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>> Yes
>>
>
> Can you apply this patch and see if this fixes your problem.
>      http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/273841/
>
> In my attempts to reproduce your problem I didn't configuring filtering
> on the upper bridge, but that is what could have been causing
> your problem.  I'll attempt it and let you know.

Even with the complete patchset which was merged upstream it doesn't 
work ;-(

What's wrong there and / or how can i debug?

Stefan

> -vlad
>
>
>> Stefan
>>
>> This mail was sent with my iPhone.
>>
>> Am 30.08.2013 um 16:13 schrieb Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>:
>>
>>> On 08/30/2013 03:24 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>>> Am 29.08.2013 22:45, schrieb Vlad Yasevich:
>>>>> On 08/29/2013 08:50 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> The packets never reach the TAP device.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is an output of ip a l (vlan 3021):
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you provide output of brctl show?
>>>>
>>>> Sure:
>>>> # brctl show
>>>> bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces
>>>> vmbr0           8000.00259084dea8       no              bond0
>>>>                                                          tap320i0
>>>> vmbr1           8000.00259084deaa       no              bond1
>>>> vmbr1v3021              8000.00259084deaa       no
>>>> tap320i1
>>>>                                                          vmbr1.3021
>>>
>>> so let me see if I can understand this configuration.
>>>
>>>           vmbr1v3021 (bridge)
>>>            /          \
>>>        tap320i1       vmbr1.3021 (vlan)
>>>                           \
>>>                           vmbr1 (bridge)
>>>                              \
>>>                             bond1
>>>                                \
>>>                              eth X
>>>
>>>
>>> Is that right? Is this the setup that has the problem you are
>>> describing?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -vlad
>>>
>>>>> On the off chance that you are actually trying to configure vlan
>>>>> filtering, can you give this patch a try (net-2.6 tree):
>>>>>
>>>>> Author: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
>>>>> Date:   Tue Aug 20 17:10:18 2013 +0900
>>>>>
>>>>>      bridge: Use the correct bit length for bitmap functions in the
>>>>> VLAN
>>>>> code
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think it made it to stable yet.
>>>>
>>>> I addd that patch and now the vlan stuff works at least on the host
>>>> node. But my tap devices still don't work.
>>>>
>>>> I also tried to attach the tap device on top of a vlan attached to
>>>> bond1
>>>> but then gvrp does not work anymore. The kernel announces gvrp once and
>>>> then does not answer the query packets from the switch.
>>>>
>>>> Stefan
>>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html