lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 12 Nov 2013 18:14:27 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	hkchu@...gle.com, mwdalton@...gle.com
Subject: Re: gso: Handle new frag_list of frags GRO packets

On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 09:29 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 05:13:43PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > Note this pskb_trim() will reallocate/copy nskb head completely, since
> > nskb is a clone. (And increment page counts of frags, then eventually
> > decrement them)
> > 
> > I tested this patch one 'router', and it seems fine, although we consume
> > ~90% more cpu doing the skb_segment() than not doing it.
> 
> I presume this is on a NIC that produces completely linear packets?

Yes, I used one host with a Mellanox (mlx4 driver), as the bnx2x 'GRO'
is partially done by the hardware...


> I wonder what happens if we don't convert head_frag to frags and just
> use frag_lists like we used to?

Yep, but this needs quite invasive changes in the GSO stack in general ?

skb_segment() callers would need to know how many MSS are stuffed per
skb, instead of assuming its 1 MSS.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists