lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5283EDCF.20605@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:23:27 +0100
From:	Chang <changxiangzhong@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
CC:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>, nhorman@...driver.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dreibh@...ula.no
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: sctp: bug fixing when sctp path recovers


On 11/13/2013 09:48 PM, Chang wrote:
>
> On 11/13/2013 08:10 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 11/13/2013 08:06 PM, Chang wrote:
>>> On 11/13/2013 09:44 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>>> On 11/13/2013 03:54 AM, Chang wrote:
>>>>> On 11/13/2013 03:37 AM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/12/2013 08:34 PM, Chang Xiangzhong wrote:
>>>>>>> Look for the __two__ most recently used path/transport and set 
>>>>>>> to active_path
>>>>>>> and retran_path respectively
>>>>
>>>> Please also for the log, elaborate a bit more, explaining what 
>>>> currently
>>>> happens, and what the effects of this bug are, so that later when 
>>>> people
>>>> are looking through the Git log they can easily get what problem 
>>>> you are
>>>> trying to fix; and if possible, add:
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: <12 digits SHA1> ("<commit title>")
>>>>
>>> Yeah, sure, I'll elaborate that more specifically.
>>
>> Thanks !
>>
>>> I assume the 12-digit SHA1 is the revision number. But may I ask 
>>> where and how shall I add the tag "Fixes" tag? The revision number 
>>> is generated after "git commit", how can I know that in advance?
>>
>> Nope, it's the affected commit id from the current git log that
>> your patch fixes.
>>
>> Have a look for example at commit:
>>
>> 98bbc06aabac5a2 ("net: x86: bpf: don't forget to free sk_filter (v2)")
> Thank you for your quick response. I'm quite green on kernel 
> programming and git. So here's one question:
> To find the the revision that **caused** the bug, I could use gitk to 
> trace the changing of the file(s) history. Is that correct?
>
Let's say the following condition
A - the initial revision
B - something was wrong that introduced a bug
C - latest revision
MyFix - fixing the bug caused by B. Shall I specify B or C in the 
"fixes:" tag?


         revision introduces a bug
          |
A -> B -> C ->MyFix
                  |
                  latest revision
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ