[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1384334146.5724.13.camel@linux-fkkt.site>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:15:46 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, dcbw@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usbnet: fix status interrupt urb handling
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 10:09 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 16:34 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> >> Since commit 7b0c5f21f348a66de495868b8df0284e8dfd6bbf
> >> "sierra_net: keep status interrupt URB active", sierra_net triggers
> >> status interrupt polling before the net_device is opened (in order to
> >> properly receive the sync message response).
> >>
> >> To be able to receive further interrupts, the interrupt urb needs to be
> >> re-submitted, so this patch removes the bogus check for netif_running().
> >
> > And what about the other drivers for whom this patch means added
> > traffic? This fix is done with a sledge hammer and cares only about
> > some drivers.
>
> usbnet_stop calls usbnet_status_stop which kills the status URB, unless
> the driver explicitly asked for it not to be killed. And the callback
> properly returns on status == -ENOENT, before the lines in question.
>
> So I think Felix is right. None of the other drivers will ever hit the
> code he deletes. It only affects sierra_net, and that is unwanted.
True. I take back the objection.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists