[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52839024.6050606@profihost.ag>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:43:48 +0100
From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@...fihost.ag>
To: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
CC: Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: how to mix bridges and bonding inc. vlans correctly on Kernel
> 3.10
Am 13.11.2013 15:34, schrieb Veaceslav Falico:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 03:20:56PM +0100, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
> wrote:
>> Hi Falico,
>> Am 13.11.2013 15:12, schrieb Veaceslav Falico:
>>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:58:40PM +0100, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> while my vlans, bridging and bonding stuff was working until 3.9 i
>>>> never
>>>> thought about how it is right. So maybe i was always wrong.
>>>>
>>>> I've this:
>>>>
>>>> eth2
>>>> \
>>>> -- bond1 -- vmbr1
>>>> /
>>>> eth3
>>>>
>>>> This works fine and as expected now i want to have a vlan using the
>>>> bonding and using a bridge.
>>>>
>>>> I the past i had this:
>>>> eth2
>>>> \
>>>> -- bond1 -- vmbr1
>>>> / \
>>>> eth3 \ vmbr1.3000
>>>> \ ---- tap114i1
>>>>
>>>> This was working fine until 3.9.X since 3.10. Right now using 3.10 i
>>>> need to put eth2 and eth3 into promisc mode to get it working ;-( this
>>>> is bad!
>>>
>>> As a guess - do you use arp monitoring for bonding? Try using miimon -
>>> there were some issues with it in 3.10, which were fixed by some huge
>>> patchsets that will never hit 3.10 stable.
>>> Also, the bonding configuration would be welcome.
>>
>> Debian Bonding konfiguration looks like this:
>> auto bond1
>> iface bond1 inet manual
>> slaves eth2 eth3
>> bond-mode 802.3ad
>> bond_miimon 100
>> bond_updelay 200
>> bond_downdelay 0
>>
>> This should be miimon using lacp and not arp isn't it?
>> Anything more needed?
>
> Yeah, it's miimon, so nothing here...
>
> I'll try to set up a reproducer in the nearest future, a bit burdened now.
>
> Are you using 3.10.X stable? Which version exactly? And at what version did
> it work - 3.9.?
I'm using 3.10.19 + this patchset from v3.12 (commit
b8bde1c4f94908ce8e3c0434fb369a00e9217497
Merge: 4b6c787 dfb5fa3
Author: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Fri Oct 18 16:03:03 2013 -0400
Merge branch 'bridge_pvid'
)
The problem is simply that the network cards and also the bonds do not
seem to know about the bridge on top so they just drop the vlan tagged
packages.
> Thank you!
>
>>
>> One thing i forgot the one with vmbr1.3000 does not work at all eben not
>> with promisc mode. The one below works fine if i set eth2 and eth3 into
>> promisc mode.
>>
>> Stefan
>>
>>>> I also tried this one without success:
>>>> eth2
>>>> \
>>>> -- bond1 -- vmbr1
>>>> / \
>>>> eth3 ----- bond1.3000 --- vmbr1v3000
>>>> \ ---- tap114i1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Greets,
>>>> Stefan
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists