[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1384355185.28458.114.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 07:06:25 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
hkchu@...gle.com, mwdalton@...gle.com
Subject: Re: gso: Handle new frag_list of frags GRO packets
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 22:26 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 06:45:04PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 10:25 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > > So a better test for the time being would be to test with TSO
> > > disabled in both cases.
> > >
> >
> > GRO on, TSO off, little difference between two cases :
> >
> > (Note some small things run in background, so these numbers are not
> > ultra precise)
>
> OK looks pretty sane.
>
> > > In the mean time I'm cooking up a patch to generate TSO packets.
> >
> > That would be very nice !
>
> It's failing on my machine but I'm not certain whether it's a bug
> in my patch or a bug in my NIC's TSO code. So I'd appreciate it
> if you can give this a spin on your mlx4.
>
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index 557e1a5..1302515 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
Well, I wont try this patch, as it can not possibly work :(
The problem is not only skb_segment() but all its callers / users, as I
mentioned yesterday.
Specifically, you'll have to change inet_gso_segment(),
gre_gso_segment(), tcp_gso_segment(), ipv6_gso_segment(),
udp6_ufo_fragment() ...
Yes, we have to propagate correct IP id identifiers, and correct tcp
sequence numbers, tcp checksums.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists