[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5284C87A.60404@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 13:56:26 +0100
From: Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>
To: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: ti/cpsw: do not crash on single-MAC machines
during resume
On 11/14/2013 01:45 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 November 2013 06:23 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> To prevent Oopses, cpsw_suspend() should only soft-reset sliver 1
>> on dual MAC enabled machines.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> index edd3e79..702b063 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> @@ -2173,8 +2173,11 @@ static int cpsw_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>
>> if (netif_running(ndev))
>> cpsw_ndo_stop(ndev);
>> +
>> soft_reset("sliver 0", &priv->slaves[0].sliver->soft_reset);
>> - soft_reset("sliver 1", &priv->slaves[1].sliver->soft_reset);
>> + if (priv->data.dual_emac)
>> + soft_reset("sliver 1", &priv->slaves[1].sliver->soft_reset);
>
> Is this tested on a system with both ports in switch mode?
Nope. I got an Ooops when I tried to suspend a machine that has only one
slave configured in DTS.
> I don't think this will not work with both ports in switch mode.
Why? Isn't priv->data.dual_emac in that case? The same condition is
checked for in cpsw_remove().
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists